PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGEG vs. EQLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGEG vs. EQLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF (BGEG) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BGEG

1D
-1.41%
1M
-9.29%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EQLT

1D
-0.68%
1M
-7.34%
6M
16.75%
YTD
22.08%
1Y
41.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGEG vs. EQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BGEG and EQLT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGEG vs. EQLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGEG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EQLT
EQLT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGEG vs. EQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF (BGEG) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGEGEQLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

BGEG vs. EQLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGEG vs. EQLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGEG drawdown since its inception was -11.84%, smaller than the maximum EQLT drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGEG and EQLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGEGEQLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.84%

-17.38%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.84%

-8.94%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-3.70%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

Volatility

BGEG vs. EQLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGEGEQLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.08%

23.13%

+12.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.08%

21.27%

+14.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.08%

21.27%

+14.81%

BGEG vs. EQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGEG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EQLT's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGEG vs. EQLT - Dividend Comparison

BGEG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.


PositionTTM20252024
BGEG
Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQLT
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF
2.87%3.10%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGEG and EQLT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQLT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQLT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BGEG.

EQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.00% for BGEG.

They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BGEG and 0.35% for EQLT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGEG and EQLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer