PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGEG vs. BGGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGEG vs. BGGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF (BGEG) and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BGEG

1D
-1.66%
1M
-6.98%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BGGG

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.20%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGEG vs. BGGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BGEG and BGGG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGEG vs. BGGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF (BGEG) and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BGEG vs. BGGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGEG vs. BGGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGEG drawdown since its inception was -8.43%, smaller than the maximum BGGG drawdown of -9.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGEG and BGGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGEGBGGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-9.83%

+1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

-2.89%

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-5.06%

+0.80%

Volatility

BGEG vs. BGGG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGEGBGGGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.94%

29.32%

+6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.94%

29.32%

+6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.94%

29.32%

+6.62%

BGEG vs. BGGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGEG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BGGG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGEG vs. BGGG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BGEG nor BGGG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BGEG and BGGG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BGGG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BGGG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BGEG.

BGEG and BGGG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BGEG is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BGGG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BGEG and 0.70% for BGGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGEG and BGGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer