BGEG vs. EMXC
BGEG (Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. BGEG is actively managed, while EMXC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGEG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
BGEG vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BGEG
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -6.98%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- 6M
- 31.09%
- YTD
- 34.23%
- 1Y
- 54.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- —
BGEG vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BGEG Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF | -7.15% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | -6.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGEG and EMXC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGEG vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
BGEG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMXC
BGEG vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF (BGEG) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGEG | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGEG vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGEG drawdown since its inception was -8.43%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGEG and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGEG | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -42.81% | +34.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.15% | -8.93% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -10.14% | +5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.90% | — |
Volatility
BGEG vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGEG | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.94% | 25.66% | +10.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.94% | 18.53% | +17.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.94% | 20.28% | +15.66% |
BGEG vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGEG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGEG vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
BGEG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGEG Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 1.98% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BGEG and EMXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BGEG.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.00% for BGEG.
They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BGEG and 0.49% for EMXC.
Find the right allocation for BGEG and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer