BGDV vs. FTAG
BGDV (Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF) and FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BGDV is actively managed, while FTAG is passively managed. Over the past year, BGDV returned 29.12% vs 31.28% for FTAG. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTAG.
Performance
BGDV vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGDV achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly lower than FTAG's 15.03% return.
BGDV
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTAG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 15.03%
- 6M
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- 31.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 5.88%
BGDV vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | 6.86% | 13.74% | -1.86% |
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 15.03% | 14.82% | -4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGDV and FTAG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | 0.53 |
The correlation between BGDV and FTAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGDV vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank
BGDV
FTAG
BGDV vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGDV | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 2.26 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | 3.18 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.19 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 8.51 | +5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGDV | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.26 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | -0.32 | +1.24 |
Drawdowns
BGDV vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGDV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGDV and FTAG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGDV | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -90.89% | +76.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.41% | -9.25% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -77.75% | +77.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -71.19% | +68.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 3.46% | -1.58% |
Volatility
BGDV vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGDV | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 5.10% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 10.69% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 14.01% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 17.41% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 19.93% | -4.35% |
BGDV vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGDV vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison
BGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FTAG's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 1.32% | 1.39% | 2.89% | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.33% | 2.16% | 1.26% | 0.61% | 1.35% |