BGDV vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BGDV (Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BGDV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bahl & Gaynor, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BGDV returned 24.61% vs 1.88% for CAOS. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. BGDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

BGDV vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGDV achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.

BGDV

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 11.64%
• 6M: 11.74%
• 1Y: 24.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGDV vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF	11.64%	13.74%	-1.86%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.82%	2.55%	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BGDV and CAOS is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	-0.35

Return for Risk

BGDV vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGDV

BGDV Risk / Return Rank: 68
BGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 40
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGDV vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGDV	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.24	+0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	1.98	+1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.26	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	2.49	+0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.33	6.22	+7.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGDV vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGDV and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGDV	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	1.24	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	1.21	-0.13

Drawdowns

BGDV vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGDV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGDV and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGDV	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.80%	-3.60%	-11.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.41%	-0.76%	-7.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.07%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-0.90%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	0.30%	+1.55%

Volatility

BGDV vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.26%. This indicates that BGDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGDV	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	0.26%	+2.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	1.03%	+7.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.13%	1.52%	+9.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.13%	4.26%	+10.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.13%	4.26%	+10.87%

BGDV vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGDV vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

BGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF	0.99%	1.13%	0.09%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGDV and CAOS in my portfolio?

BGDV and CAOS have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGDV or CAOS?

BGDV has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to CAOS (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGDV dropped -14.80% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

Which ETF is better, BGDV or CAOS?

On 1-year performance, BGDV leads with 24.61% vs 1.88% for CAOS. On fees, BGDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BGDV or CAOS?

Over the 1-year period, BGDV has performed better with a 24.61% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BGDV or CAOS?

BGDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BGDV or CAOS?

BGDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between BGDV and CAOS?

BGDV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Bahl & Gaynor and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BGDV and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.