BGDV vs. BUFX
BGDV (Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BGDV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bahl & Gaynor, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
BGDV vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGDV achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.
BGDV
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGDV vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | 11.64% | 10.70% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGDV and BUFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGDV vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
BGDV
BUFX
BGDV vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGDV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGDV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 2.68 | -1.60 |
Drawdowns
BGDV vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGDV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGDV and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGDV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -2.87% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.07% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -0.24% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | — | — |
Volatility
BGDV vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGDV | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 3.98% | +7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 3.98% | +11.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 3.98% | +11.15% |
BGDV vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGDV vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
BGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | 0.99% | 1.13% | 0.09% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGDV and BUFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BGDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BGDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
BGDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
BGDV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bahl & Gaynor and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BGDV and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for BGDV and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer