BGDV vs. AFOS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BGDV (Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

BGDV vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGDV achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 31.60% return.

BGDV

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 11.70%
• 1Y: 25.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFOS

• 1D: -3.79%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 31.60%
• 6M: 30.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGDV vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF	12.25%	10.70%
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	31.60%	37.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BGDV and AFOS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

BGDV vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGDV

BGDV Risk / Return Rank: 75
BGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

AFOS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGDV vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGDV	AFOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.77	—	—

Drawdowns

BGDV vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGDV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGDV and AFOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGDV	AFOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.80%	-11.52%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-3.79%	+2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-1.42%	-0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BGDV	AFOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.42%	21.52%	-10.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	21.52%	-6.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.08%	21.52%	-6.44%

BGDV vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BGDV and AFOS have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

BGDV vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

BGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than AFOS's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	0.23%	0.30%	0.00%
BGDV Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF	0.99%	1.13%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGDV and AFOS in my portfolio?

BGDV and AFOS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BGDV or AFOS?

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BGDV or AFOS?

BGDV and AFOS have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BGDV or AFOS?

BGDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.

What is the main difference between BGDV and AFOS?

They also come from different issuers: Bahl & Gaynor and ARS Investment Partners.