BGCIX vs. WFSPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BGCIX (BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund) and WFSPX (iShares S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - BGCIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by BlackRock, while WFSPX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, BGCIX returned 4.22%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for WFSPX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGCIX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for WFSPX.

Performance

BGCIX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGCIX achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BGCIX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 4.22%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.

BGCIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 7.26%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 4.22%

WFSPX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 5.80%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 11.72%
• 1Y: 28.93%
• 3Y*: 22.71%
• 5Y*: 14.24%
• 10Y*: 15.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGCIX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGCIX BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund	1.33%	6.55%	8.47%	8.87%	-8.02%	3.48%	10.71%	7.43%	-1.78%	3.46%
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund	11.69%	17.83%	24.94%	26.25%	-18.14%	28.63%	18.43%	31.45%	-4.83%	21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BGCIX and WFSPX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011	0.16

Over the past year, BGCIX and WFSPX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BGCIX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGCIX

BGCIX Risk / Return Rank: 95
BGCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BGCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BGCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BGCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BGCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

WFSPX

WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 73
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGCIX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGCIX	WFSPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.56	2.52	+1.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.18	3.42	+2.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.99	1.46	+0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.88	3.35	+1.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.54	15.65	+4.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGCIX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGCIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGCIX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGCIX	WFSPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.56	2.52	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.73	0.85	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.34	0.87	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	0.13	+1.21

Drawdowns

BGCIX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGCIX drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGCIX and WFSPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGCIX	WFSPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.37%	-58.21%	+47.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.99%	-8.90%	+7.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.18%	-18.74%	+16.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.78%	-24.51%	+14.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.37%	-33.74%	+23.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-12.77%	+11.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.23%	1.90%	-1.67%

Volatility

BGCIX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) is 0.39%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that BGCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGCIX	WFSPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	2.82%	-2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.97%	8.97%	-8.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36%	11.85%	-10.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.90%	16.88%	-14.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.15%	18.02%	-14.87%

BGCIX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGCIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGCIX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

BGCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than WFSPX's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGCIX BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund	5.75%	5.83%	7.13%	3.33%	8.25%	3.57%	9.87%	3.75%	6.01%	1.16%	0.00%	5.11%
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund	1.56%	1.72%	1.41%	1.50%	2.02%	1.82%	1.66%	1.99%	2.00%	1.62%	2.37%	2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGCIX and WFSPX in my portfolio?

BGCIX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGCIX or WFSPX?

WFSPX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to BGCIX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGCIX dropped -10.37% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.