PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFRG vs. FBLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BFRG vs. FBLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bullfrog AI Holdings Inc. Common Stock (BFRG) and FibroBiologics, Inc (FBLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFRG achieves a -17.29% return, which is significantly higher than FBLG's -76.21% return.


BFRG

1D
-5.17%
1M
5.67%
YTD
-17.29%
6M
-33.01%
1Y
-57.30%
3Y*
-46.28%
5Y*
10Y*

FBLG

1D
1.90%
1M
-22.46%
YTD
-76.21%
6M
-79.02%
1Y
-93.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFRG vs. FBLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BFRG
Bullfrog AI Holdings Inc. Common Stock
-17.29%-55.86%-59.02%
FBLG
FibroBiologics, Inc
-76.21%-88.76%-93.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BFRG and FBLG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BFRG:

$9.46M

FBLG:

$4.04M

EPS

BFRG:

-$0.55

FBLG:

-$7.40

PB Ratio

BFRG:

1.93

FBLG:

1.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

BFRG:

$116.67K

FBLG:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

BFRG:

$21.46K

FBLG:

-$465.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

BFRG:

-$6.11M

FBLG:

-$17.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FibroBiologics, Inc

Often compared with FBLG:
FBLG vs. BIVI

Return for Risk

BFRG vs. FBLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFRG
BFRG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BFRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFRG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BFRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLG
FBLG Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FBLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFRG vs. FBLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bullfrog AI Holdings Inc. Common Stock (BFRG) and FibroBiologics, Inc (FBLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFRGFBLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.74

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.98

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-1.45

+0.25

BFRG vs. FBLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is higher than the FBLG Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFRG and FBLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFRGFBLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

-0.76

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

-0.61

+0.27

Drawdowns

BFRG vs. FBLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFRG drawdown since its inception was -94.77%, smaller than the maximum FBLG drawdown of -99.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFRG and FBLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFRGFBLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.77%

-99.83%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.95%

-94.82%

+18.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.65%

-99.82%

+8.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.85%

-90.19%

+19.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.76%

64.08%

-16.32%

Volatility

BFRG vs. FBLG - Volatility Comparison

Bullfrog AI Holdings Inc. Common Stock (BFRG) and FibroBiologics, Inc (FBLG) have volatilities of 23.95% and 24.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFRGFBLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.95%

24.45%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

116.30%

116.65%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

154.09%

122.66%

+31.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

140.72%

152.62%

-11.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.72%

152.62%

-11.90%

Dividends

BFRG vs. FBLG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BFRG nor FBLG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BFRG vs. FBLG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bullfrog AI Holdings Inc. Common Stock and FibroBiologics, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00K40.00K60.00K80.00KJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober202600
(BFRG) Total Revenue
(FBLG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BFRG and FBLG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBLG has higher volatility (24.45%) compared to BFRG (23.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFRG dropped -94.77% vs FBLG's -99.83%.

BFRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFRG and FBLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer