PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFOC vs. TDOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFOC vs. TDOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and 21Shares Polkadot ETF (TDOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BFOC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDOT

1D
-0.50%
1M
-10.63%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFOC vs. TDOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFOC and TDOT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFOC vs. TDOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and 21Shares Polkadot ETF (TDOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFOC vs. TDOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFOCTDOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.88

-1.16

-0.72

Drawdowns

BFOC vs. TDOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum TDOT drawdown of -31.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and TDOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFOCTDOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-31.50%

+13.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.20%

-31.50%

+13.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-17.86%

+5.34%

Volatility

BFOC vs. TDOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFOCTDOTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

62.88%

-50.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

62.88%

-50.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

62.88%

-50.27%

BFOC vs. TDOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TDOT's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFOC vs. TDOT - Dividend Comparison

BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFOC and TDOT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDOT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDOT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

TDOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

BFOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TDOT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and 21Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.30% for TDOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFOC and TDOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer