BFOC vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFOC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.

Performance

BFOC vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.

BFOC

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -2.82%
• YTD: -7.39%
• 6M: -9.28%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFOC vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	-7.39%	-9.76%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	12.09%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BFOC and PQAP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

BFOC vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFOC vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BFOC	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.88	1.76	-3.64

Drawdowns

BFOC vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFOC	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.20%	-10.79%	-7.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.20%	-0.12%	-18.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.52%	-0.60%	-11.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFOC	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.61%	4.45%	+8.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.61%	11.03%	+1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.61%	11.03%	+1.58%

BFOC vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFOC vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFOC and PQAP in my portfolio?

BFOC and PQAP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFOC or PQAP?

On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFOC or PQAP?

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFOC or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

What is the main difference between BFOC and PQAP?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.50% for PQAP.