PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFOC vs. MSBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFOC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BFOC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSBT

1D
-2.70%
1M
-18.41%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFOC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFOC and MSBT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFOC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFOC vs. MSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFOCMSBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.88

-1.33

-0.55

Drawdowns

BFOC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum MSBT drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and MSBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFOCMSBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-20.25%

+2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.20%

-20.25%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-3.91%

-8.61%

Volatility

BFOC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFOCMSBTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

32.92%

-20.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

32.92%

-20.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

32.92%

-20.31%

BFOC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFOC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BFOC nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BFOC and MSBT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

BFOC and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BFOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MSBT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.14% for MSBT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFOC and MSBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer