BFOC vs. MMAX
BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) and MMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BFOC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MMAX.
Performance
BFOC vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -6.82% return, which is significantly lower than MMAX's 3.99% return.
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MMAX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 6.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.66K | $47.54K | $63.36K | |
| $53.52K | $137.56K | $145.78K |
BFOC vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -6.82% | -9.75% |
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 3.99% | 1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOC and MMAX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFOC vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank
BFOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MMAX
BFOC vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFOC | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 15.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 70.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFOC vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and MMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOC | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -1.93% | -16.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.69% | 0.00% | -17.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -0.10% | -13.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.10% | — |
Volatility
BFOC vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFOC | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 1.45% | +10.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.66% | 2.40% | +9.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.66% | 2.40% | +9.26% |
BFOC vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFOC vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison
BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 1.26% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFOC and MMAX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.50% for MMAX.
Find the right allocation for BFOC and MMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer