BFOC vs. FBUF
BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BFOC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.
Performance
BFOC vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -6.82% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 8.39% return.
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FBUF
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.66K | $47.54K | $63.36K | |
| $211.74K | $183.32K | $255.79K |
BFOC vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -6.82% | -9.75% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 8.39% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOC and FBUF is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFOC vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank
BFOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FBUF
BFOC vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFOC | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFOC vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and FBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOC | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -11.09% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.69% | 0.00% | -17.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -1.34% | -12.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility
BFOC vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFOC | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 8.45% | +3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.66% | 9.65% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.66% | 9.65% | +2.01% |
BFOC vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFOC vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison
BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.57% | 0.64% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFOC and FBUF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.48% for FBUF.
Find the right allocation for BFOC and FBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer