BFOC vs. ETHU
BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) and ETHU (Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while ETHU is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BFOC charges 0.90%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for ETHU.
Performance
BFOC vs. ETHU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.09% return, which is significantly higher than ETHU's -69.22% return.
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -10.22%
- YTD
- -7.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHU
- 1D
- 5.02%
- 1M
- 8.52%
- 6M
- -75.99%
- YTD
- -69.22%
- 1Y
- -79.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC vs. ETHU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.09% | -9.75% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | -69.22% | -57.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOC and ETHU is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFOC vs. ETHU — Risk / Return Rank
BFOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETHU
BFOC vs. ETHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFOC | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.93 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFOC vs. ETHU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum ETHU drawdown of -96.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and ETHU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOC | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -96.46% | +78.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -93.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.93% | -94.67% | +76.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.23% | -70.66% | +57.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 69.30% | — |
Volatility
BFOC vs. ETHU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFOC | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 33.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 96.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 137.59% | -125.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 142.35% | -130.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 142.35% | -130.41% |
BFOC vs. ETHU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHU's 2.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFOC vs. ETHU - Dividend Comparison
BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | 4.59% | 2.31% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFOC and ETHU have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 2.67% for ETHU.
ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
BFOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ETHU is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 2.67% for ETHU.
Find the right allocation for BFOC and ETHU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer