BFOC vs. AIRR
BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. BFOC is actively managed, while AIRR is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFOC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
BFOC vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.58% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.81% return.
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -7.58%
- 6M
- -7.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 31.81%
- 6M
- 27.48%
- 1Y
- 63.63%
- 3Y*
- 36.68%
- 5Y*
- 25.97%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
BFOC vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.58% | -9.75% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.81% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOC and AIRR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFOC vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
BFOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIRR
BFOC vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFOC | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFOC vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOC | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -42.37% | +23.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.36% | -2.80% | -15.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.84% | -7.47% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.58% | — |
Volatility
BFOC vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFOC | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 26.40% | -14.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 25.45% | -13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 26.33% | -14.02% |
BFOC vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFOC vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFOC and AIRR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
BFOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AIRR is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.69% for AIRR.
Find the right allocation for BFOC and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer