PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFMSX vs. TRSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFMSX vs. TRSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Small Cap Stock Fund (TRSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFMSX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than TRSSX's 10.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BFMSX has underperformed TRSSX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while TRSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.


BFMSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.32%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
5.06%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
2.30%

TRSSX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.94%
YTD
10.46%
6M
9.53%
1Y
21.88%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFMSX vs. TRSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFMSX
BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio
0.92%6.20%4.94%4.96%-5.34%-0.33%3.47%4.75%1.15%1.98%
TRSSX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Small Cap Stock Fund
10.46%8.21%10.93%17.65%-23.36%16.81%25.07%33.96%-3.07%15.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BFMSX and TRSSX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2000

-0.06

The correlation between BFMSX and TRSSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFMSX vs. TRSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFMSX
BFMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BFMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BFMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TRSSX
TRSSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TRSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFMSX vs. TRSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Small Cap Stock Fund (TRSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFMSXTRSSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

1.35

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.05

2.04

+2.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.24

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.24

+0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.92

8.52

+5.40

BFMSX vs. TRSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the TRSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFMSX and TRSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFMSXTRSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.35

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.22

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

0.54

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.46

+1.14

Drawdowns

BFMSX vs. TRSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFMSX drawdown since its inception was -12.70%, smaller than the maximum TRSSX drawdown of -56.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMSX and TRSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFMSXTRSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.70%

-56.38%

+43.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.52%

-10.73%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.52%

-30.88%

+29.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.96%

-32.12%

+24.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.96%

-37.85%

+29.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.07%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-9.00%

+8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

2.78%

-2.45%

Volatility

BFMSX vs. TRSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) is 0.68%, while T. Rowe Price Institutional Small Cap Stock Fund (TRSSX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that BFMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFMSXTRSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

5.04%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

14.27%

-12.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12%

17.87%

-15.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.35%

22.21%

-19.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.11%

21.55%

-19.44%

BFMSX vs. TRSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFMSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than TRSSX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFMSX vs. TRSSX - Dividend Comparison

BFMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than TRSSX's 9.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFMSX
BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio
4.66%4.56%4.14%3.34%2.67%1.23%2.04%2.63%2.51%2.17%1.76%1.87%
TRSSX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Small Cap Stock Fund
9.57%10.57%19.63%5.45%5.37%8.52%4.54%6.13%13.45%6.53%0.80%7.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFMSX and TRSSX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRSSX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to BFMSX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFMSX dropped -12.70% vs TRSSX's -56.38%.

BFMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFMSX and TRSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer