PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFMCX vs. UMMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFMCX vs. UMMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BFMCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
1.56%

UMMGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFMCX vs. UMMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFMCX
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio
0.31%7.43%0.66%5.32%-14.35%-1.52%8.32%9.85%-0.28%3.16%
UMMGX
Columbia Bond Fund
0.03%8.03%2.06%6.73%-15.66%-0.79%9.10%9.23%-0.50%3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BFMCX and UMMGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1993

0.89

The correlation between BFMCX and UMMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFMCX vs. UMMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFMCX
BFMCX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BFMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BFMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

UMMGX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFMCX vs. UMMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFMCXUMMGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.21

BFMCX vs. UMMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFMCXUMMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

Drawdowns

BFMCX vs. UMMGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFMCXUMMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

Volatility

BFMCX vs. UMMGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFMCXUMMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

BFMCX vs. UMMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFMCX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMGX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFMCX vs. UMMGX - Dividend Comparison

BFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than UMMGX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFMCX
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio
4.36%4.10%3.86%3.21%1.86%2.11%5.78%2.86%3.02%2.69%2.41%2.57%
UMMGX
Columbia Bond Fund
3.41%4.20%3.70%3.73%2.73%1.76%4.77%4.21%2.71%1.88%4.66%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFMCX and UMMGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFMCX and UMMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer