PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFMCX vs. PRCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFMCX vs. PRCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and T. Rowe Price New Income Fund (PRCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFMCX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than PRCIX's 0.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BFMCX having a 1.56% annualized return and PRCIX not far ahead at 1.62%.


BFMCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
1.56%

PRCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.64%
1Y
6.75%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
1.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFMCX vs. PRCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFMCX
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio
0.31%7.43%0.66%5.32%-14.35%-1.52%8.32%9.85%-0.28%3.16%
PRCIX
T. Rowe Price New Income Fund
0.13%8.74%2.50%5.31%-14.87%-0.54%5.77%9.28%-0.62%4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BFMCX and PRCIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1993

0.89

The correlation between BFMCX and PRCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFMCX vs. PRCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFMCX
BFMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BFMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BFMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCIX
PRCIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PRCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFMCX vs. PRCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and T. Rowe Price New Income Fund (PRCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFMCXPRCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

1.69

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

2.61

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.25

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.92

6.80

-1.88

BFMCX vs. PRCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the PRCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFMCX and PRCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFMCXPRCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.69

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.04

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.33

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.78

+0.09

Drawdowns

BFMCX vs. PRCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFMCX drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, smaller than the maximum PRCIX drawdown of -22.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMCX and PRCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFMCXPRCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.49%

-22.34%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-3.02%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.76%

-6.00%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.32%

-19.65%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.49%

-19.65%

+0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-1.42%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-4.40%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.00%

+0.11%

Volatility

BFMCX vs. PRCIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and T. Rowe Price New Income Fund (PRCIX) have volatilities of 1.42% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFMCXPRCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.48%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

2.93%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

4.01%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.14%

5.96%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

4.95%

+0.10%

BFMCX vs. PRCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BFMCX and PRCIX have an expense ratio of 0.44%.


Dividends

BFMCX vs. PRCIX - Dividend Comparison

BFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than PRCIX's 5.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFMCX
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio
4.36%4.10%3.86%3.21%1.86%2.11%5.78%2.86%3.02%2.69%2.41%2.57%
PRCIX
T. Rowe Price New Income Fund
5.95%5.94%5.65%4.37%1.80%2.65%3.33%2.88%3.03%2.66%2.56%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, BFMCX and PRCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRCIX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to BFMCX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFMCX dropped -19.49% vs PRCIX's -22.34%.

PRCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFMCX and PRCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer