BFMCX vs. NMKBX
BFMCX (BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio) and NMKBX (North Square McKee Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, BFMCX returned -0.88%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NMKBX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BFMCX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for NMKBX.
Performance
BFMCX vs. NMKBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFMCX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than NMKBX's -0.33% return.
BFMCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 1.76%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.94%
NMKBX
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 2.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BFMCX vs. NMKBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | -0.82% | 7.43% | 0.66% | 5.32% | -14.35% | -1.52% | 0.35% |
NMKBX North Square McKee Bond Fund | -0.33% | 7.26% | 1.78% | 5.96% | -9.46% | -1.24% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFMCX and NMKBX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BFMCX and NMKBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFMCX vs. NMKBX — Risk / Return Rank
BFMCX
NMKBX
BFMCX vs. NMKBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and North Square McKee Bond Fund (NMKBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFMCX | NMKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.15 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | 2.90 | -0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFMCX vs. NMKBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFMCX drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, which is greater than NMKBX's maximum drawdown of -14.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMCX and NMKBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFMCX | NMKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -14.25% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -2.69% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.59% | -5.45% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.32% | -14.25% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -2.14% | -2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -4.44% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 1.06% | +0.29% |
Volatility
BFMCX vs. NMKBX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and North Square McKee Bond Fund (NMKBX) have volatilities of 1.01% and 0.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFMCX | NMKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 0.97% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.17% | 2.89% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99% | 3.70% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 5.46% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 5.20% | -0.14% |
BFMCX vs. NMKBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFMCX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than NMKBX's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFMCX vs. NMKBX - Dividend Comparison
BFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than NMKBX's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | 4.16% | 4.10% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 1.86% | 2.11% | 5.78% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 2.69% | 2.41% | 2.57% |
NMKBX North Square McKee Bond Fund | 4.28% | 4.25% | 4.19% | 3.54% | 2.12% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFMCX and NMKBX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BFMCX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to NMKBX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFMCX dropped -19.49% vs NMKBX's -14.25%.
NMKBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFMCX and NMKBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer