BFMCX vs. FTHRX
BFMCX (BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio) and FTHRX (Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, BFMCX returned 1.54%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for FTHRX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BFMCX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTHRX.
Performance
BFMCX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFMCX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BFMCX has underperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 1.54%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.00% annualized return.
BFMCX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
FTHRX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
BFMCX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | 0.31% | 7.43% | 0.66% | 5.32% | -14.35% | -1.52% | 8.32% | 9.85% | -0.28% | 3.16% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.04% | 6.89% | 3.25% | 5.55% | -9.17% | -1.60% | 7.06% | 7.20% | 0.52% | 2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFMCX and FTHRX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1992 | 0.87 |
The correlation between BFMCX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFMCX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank
BFMCX
FTHRX
BFMCX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFMCX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.73 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 4.83 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFMCX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFMCX drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMCX and FTHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFMCX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -19.01% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -2.11% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.76% | -2.68% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.32% | -13.18% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.49% | -13.25% | -6.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -1.28% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -3.06% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 0.75% | +0.42% |
Volatility
BFMCX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.89%. This indicates that BFMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFMCX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 0.89% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 2.08% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 2.78% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.14% | 4.03% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 3.40% | +1.66% |
BFMCX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFMCX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFMCX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison
BFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than FTHRX's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | 4.36% | 4.10% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 1.86% | 2.11% | 5.78% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 2.69% | 2.41% | 2.57% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.70% | 3.59% | 3.49% | 2.94% | 1.55% | 1.53% | 4.16% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 2.20% | 2.63% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BFMCX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BFMCX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to FTHRX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFMCX dropped -19.49% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.
FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFMCX and FTHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer