BFLX vs. FFLS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BFLX (iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF) and FFLS (The Future Fund Long/Short ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFLX charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for FFLS.

Performance

BFLX vs. FFLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BFLX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -1.16%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFLS

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: -4.12%
• YTD: -2.16%
• 1Y: -3.85%
• 3Y*: 7.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFLX vs. FFLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF	0.50%
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BFLX and FFLS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2026	0.67

BFLX vs. FFLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BFLX	FFLS
Technology	30.3%	13.8%
Financial Services	15.4%	-7.9%
Industrials	12.3%	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	2.3%
Communication Services	7.4%	5.6%
Healthcare	7.4%	14.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	1.7%
Basic Materials	3.4%	-
Utilities	3.2%	-
Energy	2.9%	4.8%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.5%

Return for Risk

BFLX vs. FFLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFLS

FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 6
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFLX vs. FFLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFLX	FFLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.48	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.94	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.71	—

Drawdowns

BFLX vs. FFLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFLX drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, smaller than the maximum FFLS drawdown of -11.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLX and FFLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFLX	FFLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-11.05%	+7.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.05%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-6.77%	+4.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.37%	-3.21%	+1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFLX	FFLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.09%	9.93%	+4.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.09%	11.40%	+2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.09%	11.40%	+2.69%

BFLX vs. FFLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFLX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLS's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFLX vs. FFLS - Dividend Comparison

BFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	6.72%	6.58%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFLX and FFLS in my portfolio?

BFLX and FFLS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFLX or FFLS?

On fees, BFLX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFLX or FFLS?

BFLX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for FFLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFLX or FFLS?

FFLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.72%, compared with 0.00% for BFLX.

What is the main difference between BFLX and FFLS?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and The Future Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BFLX and 1.75% for FFLS.