BFJL vs. SOLX.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) and SOLX.TO (CI Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while SOLX.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by CI. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFJL charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SOLX.TO.

Performance

BFJL vs. SOLX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and CI Galaxy Solana ETF (SOLX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BFJL is traded in USD, while SOLX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SOLX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly higher than SOLX.TO's -39.76% return.

BFJL

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 3.41%
• 6M: -7.73%
• YTD: -4.47%
• 1Y: -15.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOLX.TO

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: -47.00%
• YTD: -39.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFJL vs. SOLX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	-4.47%	-8.78%
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF	-39.76%	-40.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BFJL and SOLX.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

BFJL vs. SOLX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFJL

BFJL Risk / Return Rank: 2
BFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

SOLX.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFJL vs. SOLX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and CI Galaxy Solana ETF (SOLX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFJL	SOLX.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.21	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	—	—

Drawdowns

BFJL vs. SOLX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum SOLX.TO drawdown of -75.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and SOLX.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFJL	SOLX.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-75.46%	+54.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.46%	-70.22%	+51.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.67%	-51.09%	+38.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFJL	SOLX.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.16%	76.13%	-62.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.27%	76.13%	-62.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.27%	76.13%	-62.86%

BFJL vs. SOLX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLX.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFJL vs. SOLX.TO - Dividend Comparison

BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, while SOLX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	1.41%	1.35%
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF	0.79%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFJL and SOLX.TO in my portfolio?

BFJL and SOLX.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFJL or SOLX.TO?

On fees, BFJL is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFJL or SOLX.TO?

BFJL is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLX.TO.

What is the main difference between BFJL and SOLX.TO?

BFJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SOLX.TO is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 1.00% for SOLX.TO.