BFJL vs. NFTY
BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFJL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
BFJL vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -7.67% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return.
BFJL
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- -7.67%
- 6M
- -10.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -9.70%
- 6M
- -7.99%
- 1Y
- -8.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
BFJL vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | -7.67% | -7.43% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -9.70% | -1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFJL and NFTY is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFJL vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
BFJL
NFTY
BFJL vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFJL | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.14 | 0.28 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
BFJL vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFJL | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -47.67% | +26.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.20% | -17.45% | -3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -9.58% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.12% | — |
Volatility
BFJL vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFJL | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 14.72% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 17.39% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 20.72% | -6.96% |
BFJL vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFJL vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than NFTY's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.46% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.96% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFJL and NFTY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.46% for BFJL.
BFJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 0.80% for NFTY.
Find the right allocation for BFJL and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer