PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFJL vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFJL vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -7.67% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 5.32% return.


BFJL

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-7.67%
6M
-10.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBUF

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.85%
YTD
5.32%
6M
6.28%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFJL vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFJL and FBUF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFJL vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFJL

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFJL vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFJL vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFJLFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.14

1.47

-2.61

Drawdowns

BFJL vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and FBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFJLFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-11.09%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.20%

-0.22%

-20.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-1.38%

-10.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

Volatility

BFJL vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFJLFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

7.49%

+6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

9.55%

+4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

9.55%

+4.21%

BFJL vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFJL vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than FBUF's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BFJL
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July
1.46%1.35%0.00%
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
0.63%0.64%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFJL and FBUF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.

BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.63% for FBUF.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 0.48% for FBUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFJL and FBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer