PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFGUX vs. FMDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFGUX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Focused Growth Fund R6 Shares (BFGUX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFGUX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than FMDGX's 0.68% return.


BFGUX

1D
3.47%
1M
-4.81%
6M
2.26%
YTD
0.13%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.66%

FMDGX

1D
0.54%
1M
-2.91%
6M
-1.48%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
-2.91%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BFGUX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BFGUX
Baron Focused Growth Fund R6 Shares
0.13%22.26%29.85%27.75%-28.03%18.99%122.96%11.37%
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
0.68%8.60%22.03%25.79%-26.67%12.67%34.84%4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BFGUX and FMDGX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.81

The correlation between BFGUX and FMDGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFGUX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFGUX
BFGUX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BFGUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFGUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFGUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BFGUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFGUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FMDGX
FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFGUX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Focused Growth Fund R6 Shares (BFGUX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFGUXFMDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.99

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.20

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

-0.56

+3.50

BFGUX vs. FMDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFGUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the FMDGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFGUX and FMDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFGUX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFGUX drawdown since its inception was -43.60%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFGUX and FMDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFGUXFMDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.60%

-38.59%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.48%

-14.75%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.98%

-25.30%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.71%

-38.59%

+2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.59%

-6.12%

-7.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-11.03%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

5.23%

-0.49%

Volatility

BFGUX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison

Baron Focused Growth Fund R6 Shares (BFGUX) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 5.13%. This indicates that BFGUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFGUXFMDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

5.13%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.06%

13.73%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.06%

17.42%

+5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.02%

22.50%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.39%

24.22%

+0.17%

BFGUX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFGUX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFGUX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison

BFGUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BFGUX
Baron Focused Growth Fund R6 Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.78%15.00%2.78%1.74%1.05%2.08%5.92%
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
1.84%1.85%0.47%0.63%0.81%6.43%0.36%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFGUX and FMDGX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFGUX has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to FMDGX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFGUX dropped -43.60% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.

BFGUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFGUX and FMDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer