BFEB vs. SPYD
BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BFEB returned 11.70%/yr vs 6.76%/yr for SPYD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPYD.
Performance
BFEB vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 10.34% return.
BFEB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYD
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 16.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
BFEB vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 8.25% | 12.99% | 17.58% | 22.35% | -6.76% | 18.05% | 10.17% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 10.34% | 4.65% | 15.34% | 3.91% | -1.17% | 32.73% | -8.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFEB and SPYD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BFEB and SPYD has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BFEB vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BFEB
SPYD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BFEB
SPYD
Financial Services
BFEB
SPYD
Communication Services
BFEB
SPYD
Consumer Cyclical
BFEB
SPYD
Healthcare
BFEB
SPYD
Industrials
BFEB
SPYD
Consumer Defensive
BFEB
SPYD
Energy
BFEB
SPYD
Utilities
BFEB
SPYD
Real Estate
BFEB
SPYD
Basic Materials
BFEB
SPYD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFEB vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank
BFEB
SPYD
BFEB vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFEB | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.24 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 2.33 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.95 | 6.77 | +10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFEB | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.42 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.42 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.47 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
BFEB vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and SPYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFEB | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | -46.42% | +20.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.41% | -7.05% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -16.13% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.84% | -22.25% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.11% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -6.17% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 2.43% | -1.18% |
Volatility
BFEB vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is 1.51%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that BFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFEB | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 2.57% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.31% | 7.71% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.10% | 11.62% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 16.13% | -4.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 19.78% | -5.59% |
BFEB vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFEB vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison
BFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 4.21% | 4.52% | 4.31% | 4.66% | 5.01% | 3.68% | 4.95% | 4.42% | 4.75% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFEB and SPYD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYD has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to BFEB (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -26.37% vs SPYD's -46.42%.
On 5-year performance, BFEB leads with 11.70% vs 6.76% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 6.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BFEB.
SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 0.00% for BFEB.
BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while SPYD is S&P 500. BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFEB and 0.07% for SPYD.
BFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFEB and SPYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer