PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFEB vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFEB vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 10.34% return.


BFEB

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.99%
YTD
8.25%
6M
9.24%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*

SPYD

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.97%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFEB vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BFEB
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February
8.25%12.99%17.58%22.35%-6.76%18.05%10.17%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
10.34%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BFEB and SPYD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between BFEB and SPYD has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BFEB vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BFEB
SPYD

Technology

36.2%
2.7%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.1%

Communication Services

10.9%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
6.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
5.2%

Industrials

8.1%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
16.3%

Energy

3.5%
9.2%

Utilities

2.3%
11.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
25.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.4%

Technology

BFEB
36.2%
SPYD
2.7%

Financial Services

BFEB
11.9%
SPYD
12.1%

Communication Services

BFEB
10.9%
SPYD
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BFEB
10.1%
SPYD
6.5%

Healthcare

BFEB
8.4%
SPYD
5.2%

Industrials

BFEB
8.1%
SPYD
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

BFEB
4.9%
SPYD
16.3%

Energy

BFEB
3.5%
SPYD
9.2%

Utilities

BFEB
2.3%
SPYD
11.4%

Real Estate

BFEB
1.9%
SPYD
25.8%

Basic Materials

BFEB
1.8%
SPYD
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFEB vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFEB
BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFEB vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFEBSPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.24

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.33

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.95

6.77

+10.18

BFEB vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFEB and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFEBSPYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.42

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.42

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.47

+0.43

Drawdowns

BFEB vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFEBSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.37%

-46.42%

+20.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.41%

-7.05%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-16.13%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.84%

-22.25%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.11%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-6.17%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

2.43%

-1.18%

Volatility

BFEB vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is 1.51%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that BFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFEBSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

2.57%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.31%

7.71%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.10%

11.62%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.39%

16.13%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.19%

19.78%

-5.59%

BFEB vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFEB vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

BFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFEB
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.21%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFEB and SPYD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYD has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to BFEB (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -26.37% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 5-year performance, BFEB leads with 11.70% vs 6.76% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 6.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BFEB.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 0.00% for BFEB.

BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while SPYD is S&P 500. BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFEB and 0.07% for SPYD.

BFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFEB and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer