BFEB vs. SPMO
BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BFEB returned 11.70%/yr vs 24.29%/yr for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
BFEB vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
BFEB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
BFEB vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 8.25% | 12.99% | 17.58% | 22.35% | -6.76% | 18.05% | 10.17% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 23.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFEB and SPMO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BFEB and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
BFEB vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BFEB
SPMO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BFEB
SPMO
Financial Services
BFEB
SPMO
Communication Services
BFEB
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
BFEB
SPMO
Healthcare
BFEB
SPMO
Industrials
BFEB
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
BFEB
SPMO
Energy
BFEB
SPMO
Utilities
BFEB
SPMO
Real Estate
BFEB
SPMO
Basic Materials
BFEB
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFEB vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
BFEB
SPMO
BFEB vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFEB | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.47 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 3.64 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.95 | 14.17 | +2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFEB | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.62 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.27 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.01 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
BFEB vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFEB | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | -30.95% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.41% | -12.70% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -20.13% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.84% | -22.74% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | 0.00% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -4.60% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 3.26% | -2.01% |
Volatility
BFEB vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is 1.51%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that BFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFEB | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 7.35% | -5.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.31% | 14.39% | -8.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.10% | 17.64% | -9.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 19.30% | -7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 20.31% | -6.12% |
BFEB vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFEB vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
BFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFEB and SPMO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to BFEB (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -26.37% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.29% vs 11.70% for BFEB. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, BFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BFEB.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for BFEB.
BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while SPMO is Momentum. BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFEB and 0.13% for SPMO.
BFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFEB and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer