PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFCAX vs. SRINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFCAX vs. SRINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Corporate Bond Fund (BFCAX) and Columbia Corporate Income Fund (SRINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFCAX achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than SRINX's -0.21% return.


BFCAX

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.83%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-0.37%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.85%
10Y*

SRINX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.04%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.21%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFCAX vs. SRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFCAX
American Funds Corporate Bond Fund
-0.37%6.67%1.71%6.85%-16.51%-2.15%13.05%13.21%-2.50%5.61%
SRINX
Columbia Corporate Income Fund
-0.21%7.34%2.05%9.17%-15.52%-0.69%11.38%15.28%-3.50%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BFCAX and SRINX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.93

The correlation between BFCAX and SRINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFCAX vs. SRINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFCAX
BFCAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BFCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BFCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SRINX
SRINX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SRINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFCAX vs. SRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Corporate Bond Fund (BFCAX) and Columbia Corporate Income Fund (SRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFCAXSRINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.40

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

4.74

-1.42

BFCAX vs. SRINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the SRINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFCAX and SRINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFCAX vs. SRINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFCAX drawdown since its inception was -23.01%, which is greater than SRINX's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFCAX and SRINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFCAXSRINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.01%

-21.63%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-3.00%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.92%

-6.02%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-21.63%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-1.58%

-4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-2.84%

-3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

0.88%

+0.26%

Volatility

BFCAX vs. SRINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Corporate Bond Fund (BFCAX) is 1.10%, while Columbia Corporate Income Fund (SRINX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that BFCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFCAXSRINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.25%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

3.15%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

3.97%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

6.42%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.97%

5.82%

+0.15%

BFCAX vs. SRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFCAX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SRINX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFCAX vs. SRINX - Dividend Comparison

BFCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than SRINX's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFCAX
American Funds Corporate Bond Fund
4.23%4.20%4.06%2.82%1.95%1.50%4.43%3.44%2.63%2.68%0.00%0.00%
SRINX
Columbia Corporate Income Fund
4.69%4.53%3.70%3.63%3.10%4.32%6.71%3.10%3.23%2.69%3.02%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BFCAX and SRINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SRINX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to BFCAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFCAX dropped -23.01% vs SRINX's -21.63%.

SRINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFCAX and SRINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer