BFAP vs. USDX
BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and USDX (SGI Enhanced Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFAP is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while USDX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BFAP returned -24.44% vs 6.22% for USDX. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for USDX.
Performance
BFAP vs. USDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -20.89% return, which is significantly lower than USDX's 1.99% return.
BFAP
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -20.89%
- 6M
- -23.66%
- 1Y
- -24.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 6.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFAP vs. USDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | -20.89% | 8.90% |
USDX SGI Enhanced Core ETF | 1.99% | 4.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFAP and USDX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFAP vs. USDX — Risk / Return Rank
BFAP
USDX
BFAP vs. USDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFAP | USDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.82 | -1.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 6.66 | -7.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | 47.89 | -49.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFAP | USDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | 3.26 | -4.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 4.03 | -4.62 |
Drawdowns
BFAP vs. USDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than USDX's maximum drawdown of -0.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and USDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFAP | USDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -0.94% | -30.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.25% | -0.94% | -30.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.25% | -0.45% | -30.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -0.06% | -10.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.89% | 0.13% | +16.76% |
Volatility
BFAP vs. USDX - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) at 1.00%. This indicates that BFAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFAP | USDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 1.00% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.66% | 1.72% | +15.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 1.91% | +19.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 1.68% | +18.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 1.68% | +18.89% |
BFAP vs. USDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than USDX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFAP vs. USDX - Dividend Comparison
BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.98%, more than USDX's 5.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | 23.98% | 18.97% | 0.00% |
USDX SGI Enhanced Core ETF | 5.89% | 5.88% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFAP and USDX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BFAP has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to USDX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -31.25% vs USDX's -0.94%.
On 1-year performance, USDX leads with 6.22% vs -24.44% for BFAP. On fees, BFAP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, USDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USDX has performed better with a 6.22% return vs -24.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BFAP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.
BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 23.98%, compared with 5.89% for USDX.
BFAP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while USDX is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.98% for USDX.
USDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFAP and USDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer