PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFAP vs. USDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFAP vs. USDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -20.89% return, which is significantly lower than USDX's 1.99% return.


BFAP

1D
-1.05%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
-20.89%
6M
-23.66%
1Y
-24.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.50%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFAP vs. USDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BFAP
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April
-20.89%8.90%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
1.99%4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BFAP and USDX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFAP vs. USDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFAP
BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

USDX
USDX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
USDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
USDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFAP vs. USDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFAPUSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.82

-1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

6.66

-7.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

47.89

-49.34

BFAP vs. USDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the USDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFAP and USDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFAPUSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.15

3.26

-4.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

4.03

-4.62

Drawdowns

BFAP vs. USDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than USDX's maximum drawdown of -0.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and USDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFAPUSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.25%

-0.94%

-30.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.25%

-0.94%

-30.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.25%

-0.45%

-30.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-0.06%

-10.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.89%

0.13%

+16.76%

Volatility

BFAP vs. USDX - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) at 1.00%. This indicates that BFAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFAPUSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

1.00%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.66%

1.72%

+15.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

1.91%

+19.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

1.68%

+18.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.57%

1.68%

+18.89%

BFAP vs. USDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than USDX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFAP vs. USDX - Dividend Comparison

BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.98%, more than USDX's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BFAP
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April
23.98%18.97%0.00%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
5.89%5.88%4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFAP and USDX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFAP has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to USDX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -31.25% vs USDX's -0.94%.

On 1-year performance, USDX leads with 6.22% vs -24.44% for BFAP. On fees, BFAP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, USDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USDX has performed better with a 6.22% return vs -24.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BFAP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 23.98%, compared with 5.89% for USDX.

BFAP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while USDX is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.98% for USDX.

USDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFAP and USDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer