BFAP vs. FTXL
BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFAP is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. BFAP is actively managed, while FTXL is passively managed. Over the past year, BFAP returned -24.44% vs 225.15% for FTXL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
BFAP vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -20.89% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
BFAP
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -20.89%
- 6M
- -23.66%
- 1Y
- -24.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
BFAP vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | -20.89% | 8.90% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 106.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFAP and FTXL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFAP vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
BFAP
FTXL
BFAP vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFAP | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.78 | -0.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 15.62 | -16.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | 58.28 | -59.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFAP | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | 6.33 | -7.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.94 | -1.52 |
Drawdowns
BFAP vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFAP | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -43.87% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.25% | -14.51% | -16.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.25% | 0.00% | -31.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -10.56% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.89% | 3.88% | +13.01% |
Volatility
BFAP vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) is 3.59%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that BFAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFAP | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 14.28% | -10.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.66% | 28.98% | -11.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 35.94% | -14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 36.02% | -15.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 34.25% | -13.68% |
BFAP vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFAP vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.98%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | 23.98% | 18.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFAP and FTXL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to BFAP (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -31.25% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 1-year performance, FTXL leads with 225.15% vs -24.44% for BFAP. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 225.15% return vs -24.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.
BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 23.98%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.
BFAP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FTXL is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFAP and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer