BFAP vs. EZBC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BFAP is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. Over the past year, BFAP returned -25.68% vs -39.76% for EZBC. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

BFAP vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -22.18% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -28.83% return.

BFAP

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -7.11%
• YTD: -22.18%
• 6M: -22.50%
• 1Y: -25.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: -17.79%
• YTD: -28.83%
• 6M: -28.96%
• 1Y: -39.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFAP vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-22.18%	8.90%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-28.83%	6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BFAP and EZBC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.96

The correlation between BFAP and EZBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BFAP vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFAP vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFAP	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.20	-0.90	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.66	-1.26	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	0.86	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	-0.77	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	-1.30	-0.10

BFAP vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFAP and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFAP vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFAP	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.31%	-52.07%	+18.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.31%	-52.07%	+18.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.37%	-50.46%	+18.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.64%	-16.89%	+5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.39%	30.56%	-12.17%

Volatility

BFAP vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) is 5.22%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 13.04%. This indicates that BFAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFAP	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	13.04%	-7.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.92%	34.61%	-17.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.43%	44.23%	-22.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.47%	50.15%	-29.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.47%	50.15%	-29.68%

BFAP vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFAP vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.38%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	24.38%	18.97%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFAP and EZBC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, BFAP and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BFAP or EZBC?

EZBC has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to BFAP (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -33.31% vs EZBC's -52.07%.

Which ETF is better, BFAP or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, BFAP leads with -25.68% vs -39.76% for EZBC. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFAP or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, BFAP has performed better with a -25.68% return vs -39.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFAP or EZBC?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFAP or EZBC?

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 24.38%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between BFAP and EZBC?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.19% for EZBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.90 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.