BEX vs. LRCU
BEX (Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
BEX vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BEX
- 1D
- -13.99%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU
- 1D
- -18.44%
- 1M
- 38.68%
- YTD
- 270.56%
- 6M
- 254.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEX vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | -4.58% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 38.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEX and LRCU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEX vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEX vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEX drawdown since its inception was -47.06%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEX and LRCU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEX | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.06% | -40.09% | -6.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.99% | -18.44% | +4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -9.25% | -12.80% |
Volatility
BEX vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEX | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 205.49% | 116.41% | +89.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 205.49% | 116.41% | +89.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 205.49% | 116.41% | +89.08% |
BEX vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BEX and LRCU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
BEX vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison
Neither BEX nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BEX and LRCU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEX and LRCU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
BEX and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for BEX and LRCU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer