BEX vs. IWML
BEX (Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and IWML (ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BEX is actively managed, while IWML is passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for IWML.
Performance
BEX vs. IWML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BEX
- 1D
- -13.99%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWML
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 39.21%
- 6M
- 32.71%
- 1Y
- 83.07%
- 3Y*
- 27.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.12%
- 10Y*
- —
BEX vs. IWML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | -4.58% |
IWML ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEX and IWML is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEX vs. IWML — Risk / Return Rank
BEX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWML
BEX vs. IWML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEX) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEX | IWML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEX vs. IWML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEX drawdown since its inception was -47.06%, smaller than the maximum IWML drawdown of -60.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEX and IWML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEX | IWML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.06% | -60.06% | +13.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.99% | 0.00% | -13.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -31.60% | +9.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.51% | — |
Volatility
BEX vs. IWML - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEX | IWML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 205.49% | 39.15% | +166.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 205.49% | 46.19% | +159.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 205.49% | 46.14% | +159.35% |
BEX vs. IWML - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IWML's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEX vs. IWML - Dividend Comparison
Neither BEX nor IWML has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BEX and IWML have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWML is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWML is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BEX.
BEX and IWML have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BEX and 0.95% for IWML.
Find the right allocation for BEX and IWML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer