BETE vs. YBTC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Over the past year, BETE returned -46.25% vs -41.50% for YBTC. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

BETE vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -33.38% return, which is significantly lower than YBTC's -22.75% return.

BETE

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: 1.02%
• 6M: -38.98%
• YTD: -33.38%
• 1Y: -46.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YBTC

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 0.37%
• 6M: -28.50%
• YTD: -22.75%
• 1Y: -41.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETE vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-33.38%	-8.17%	58.27%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-22.75%	-4.23%	55.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and YBTC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024	0.84

The correlation between BETE and YBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BETE vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 3
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETE vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETE	YBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	-1.04	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.16	-1.48	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.82	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	-0.85	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	-1.38	+0.19

BETE vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and YBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETE vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than YBTC's maximum drawdown of -48.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and YBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETE	YBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.75%	-48.84%	-12.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.75%	-48.84%	-12.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.32%	-43.59%	-12.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.93%	-14.41%	-8.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.91%	30.02%	+8.89%

Volatility

BETE vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 9.30%. This indicates that BETE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETE	YBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.76%	9.30%	+3.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.89%	32.48%	+8.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.70%	40.19%	+15.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.32%	40.71%	+15.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.32%	40.71%	+15.61%

BETE vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BETE and YBTC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

BETE vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.32%, less than YBTC's 83.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	78.32%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	83.05%	76.04%	44.53%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETE and YBTC in my portfolio?

BETE and YBTC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETE or YBTC?

BETE has higher volatility (12.76%) compared to YBTC (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -61.75% vs YBTC's -48.84%.

Which ETF is better, BETE or YBTC?

On 1-year performance, YBTC leads with -41.50% vs -46.25% for BETE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETE or YBTC?

Over the 1-year period, YBTC has performed better with a -41.50% return vs -46.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETE or YBTC?

BETE and YBTC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETE or YBTC?

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 83.05%, compared with 78.32% for BETE.

What is the main difference between BETE and YBTC?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BETE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.