BETE vs. BITI
BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. Over the past year, BETE returned -47.08% vs 64.56% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.92, they often move in opposite directions. BETE charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
BETE vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -34.01% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.73% return.
BETE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- 6M
- -39.69%
- YTD
- -34.01%
- 1Y
- -47.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 36.51%
- YTD
- 24.73%
- 1Y
- 64.56%
- 3Y*
- -31.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETE vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | -34.01% | -8.17% | 66.02% | 36.61% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 24.73% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -37.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETE and BITI is -0.95, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | -0.92 |
The correlation between BETE and BITI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.95 to -0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETE vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
BETE
BITI
BETE vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETE | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.25 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 2.57 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 6.36 | -7.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETE vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETE | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.75% | -92.16% | +30.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.75% | -25.28% | -36.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.73% | -86.38% | +29.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.98% | -68.42% | +45.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.07% | 10.18% | +28.89% |
Volatility
BETE vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) has a higher volatility of 12.69% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 10.69%. This indicates that BETE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETE | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.69% | 10.69% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.62% | 34.09% | +6.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.23% | 44.07% | +11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.28% | 52.21% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.28% | 52.21% | +4.07% |
BETE vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETE vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.06%, more than BITI's 15.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | 79.06% | 68.22% | 15.22% | 0.78% | 0.00% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.59% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETE and BITI have a correlation of -0.95, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BETE has higher volatility (12.69%) compared to BITI (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -61.75% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.56% vs -47.08% for BETE. On fees, BETE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 10.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.56% return vs -47.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BETE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BETE has the higher dividend yield at 79.06%, compared with 15.59% for BITI.
Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETE and 1.03% for BITI.
BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETE and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer