BESIX vs. FPADX
Compare and contrast key facts about William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (BESIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX).
BESIX is managed by William Blair. It was launched on Oct 23, 2011. FPADX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
BESIX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BESIX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BESIX William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund | 3.79% | 13.93% | 8.37% | 22.25% | -27.95% | 15.52% | 32.60% | 20.58% | -23.29% | 40.54% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 0.22% | 33.90% | 6.80% | 9.51% | -20.06% | -3.07% | 17.84% | 18.28% | -14.65% | 35.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BESIX achieves a 3.79% return, which is significantly higher than FPADX's 0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BESIX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 8.19%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.51% annualized return.
BESIX
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -10.74%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 33.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
FPADX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -12.34%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BESIX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BESIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BESIX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank
BESIX
FPADX
BESIX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (BESIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BESIX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 1.64 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 2.18 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.98 | +0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.98 | 8.08 | +1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BESIX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.64 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.21 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.43 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.27 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between BESIX and FPADX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BESIX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison
BESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than FPADX's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BESIX William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.53% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 4.84% | 8.51% | 0.04% | 0.16% | 2.32% | 3.17% | 2.67% | 4.17% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 2.35% | 2.35% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 2.47% | 2.14% | 1.50% | 2.59% | 2.20% | 0.12% | 1.69% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
BESIX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BESIX drawdown since its inception was -38.05%, roughly equal to the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BESIX and FPADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BESIX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.05% | -39.16% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -13.28% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.41% | -37.04% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.05% | -39.16% | +1.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -13.28% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -13.39% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.26% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BESIX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (BESIX) is 8.27%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that BESIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BESIX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 8.84% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 13.29% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 17.59% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 16.64% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 17.60% | -1.59% |