BESF vs. OIH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) and OIH (VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. BESF is actively managed, while OIH is passively managed. Over the past year, BESF returned 70.53% vs 99.03% for OIH. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BESF charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for OIH.

Performance

BESF vs. OIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BESF achieves a 20.81% return, which is significantly lower than OIH's 54.15% return.

BESF

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: 20.81%
• 6M: 20.48%
• 1Y: 70.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OIH

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 54.15%
• 6M: 45.31%
• 1Y: 99.03%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: 14.03%
• 10Y*: -1.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BESF vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	20.81%	41.15%
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF	54.15%	29.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BESF and OIH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

BESF vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OIH

OIH Risk / Return Rank: 91
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BESF vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BESF	OIH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.92	0.01	+2.92

Drawdowns

BESF vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BESF drawdown since its inception was -9.89%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BESF and OIH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BESF	OIH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.89%	-94.45%	+84.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.89%	-9.54%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-43.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.04%	-60.91%	+55.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-48.85%	+46.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BESF	OIH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.29%	29.38%	-5.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.29%	36.80%	-12.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.29%	42.41%	-18.12%

BESF vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BESF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than OIH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BESF vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison

BESF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than OIH's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.63%	6.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF	1.11%	1.71%	2.01%	1.36%	0.95%	0.98%	1.23%	2.10%	2.13%	2.60%	1.40%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BESF and OIH in my portfolio?

BESF and OIH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BESF or OIH?

On 1-year performance, OIH leads with 99.03% vs 70.53% for BESF. On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BESF or OIH?

Over the 1-year period, OIH has performed better with a 99.03% return vs 70.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BESF or OIH?

OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BESF or OIH?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.63%, compared with 1.11% for OIH.

What is the main difference between BESF and OIH?

They also come from different issuers: Bastion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BESF and 0.35% for OIH.