BESF vs. FMUB
BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) and FMUB (Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion, while FMUB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. BESF charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FMUB.
Performance
BESF vs. FMUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BESF achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly higher than FMUB's 1.89% return.
BESF
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMUB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 7.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESF vs. FMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 19.74% | 41.15% |
FMUB Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF | 1.89% | 5.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BESF and FMUB is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BESF vs. FMUB — Risk / Return Rank
BESF
FMUB
BESF vs. FMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BESF | FMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.87 | 2.30 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
BESF vs. FMUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BESF drawdown since its inception was -9.89%, which is greater than FMUB's maximum drawdown of -2.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BESF and FMUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BESF | FMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -2.49% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.88% | -0.10% | -5.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -0.38% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility
BESF vs. FMUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BESF | FMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.33% | 2.67% | +21.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 3.25% | +21.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 3.25% | +21.08% |
BESF vs. FMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BESF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUB's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
BESF vs. FMUB - Dividend Comparison
BESF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than FMUB's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 5.68% | 6.39% |
FMUB Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF | 3.42% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BESF and FMUB have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.
BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 3.42% for FMUB.
BESF is categorized as Energy Equities, while FMUB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Bastion and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BESF and 0.30% for FMUB.
Find the right allocation for BESF and FMUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer