PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BERCX vs. NMAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BERCX vs. NMAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BERCX achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly higher than NMAVX's 4.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BERCX has outperformed NMAVX with an annualized return of 8.77%, while NMAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.40% annualized return.


BERCX

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.95%
YTD
8.82%
6M
11.23%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
8.77%

NMAVX

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.68%
YTD
4.74%
6M
5.75%
1Y
12.11%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BERCX vs. NMAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BERCX
Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund
8.82%11.77%11.35%6.93%-11.61%27.30%-3.83%23.31%-10.92%16.98%
NMAVX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund
4.74%1.91%5.20%6.44%-5.26%11.10%4.41%30.71%-5.44%14.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BERCX and NMAVX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2014

0.86

The correlation between BERCX and NMAVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BERCX vs. NMAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BERCX
BERCX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

NMAVX
NMAVX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
NMAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NMAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BERCX vs. NMAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BERCXNMAVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.01

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

1.57

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.17

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.62

3.01

+3.61

BERCX vs. NMAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BERCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the NMAVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BERCX and NMAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BERCXNMAVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.01

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.21

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.49

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.51

-0.12

Drawdowns

BERCX vs. NMAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BERCX drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, which is greater than NMAVX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERCX and NMAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BERCXNMAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.71%

-30.93%

-21.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-9.80%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.57%

-18.40%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.04%

-18.40%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-30.93%

-11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-5.37%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-3.80%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.80%

-0.42%

Volatility

BERCX vs. NMAVX - Volatility Comparison

Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) at 3.80%. This indicates that BERCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BERCXNMAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

3.80%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

8.06%

+3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

11.54%

+4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

13.33%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

15.04%

+4.19%

BERCX vs. NMAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BERCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAVX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

BERCX vs. NMAVX - Dividend Comparison

BERCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.68%, more than NMAVX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BERCX
Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund
11.68%12.71%13.39%3.20%1.12%0.60%1.12%2.08%8.03%23.00%3.32%0.92%
NMAVX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund
0.95%1.00%7.55%1.78%9.05%11.98%0.61%5.91%7.16%7.05%1.83%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BERCX and NMAVX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BERCX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to NMAVX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERCX dropped -52.71% vs NMAVX's -30.93%.

BERCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BERCX and NMAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer