BERCX vs. FSLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BERCX (Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund) and FSLSX (Fidelity Value Strategies Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BERCX returned 8.89%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for FSLSX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BERCX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FSLSX.

Performance

BERCX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BERCX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 21.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BERCX has underperformed FSLSX with an annualized return of 8.89%, while FSLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.

BERCX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 22.32%
• 3Y*: 13.39%
• 5Y*: 6.96%
• 10Y*: 8.89%

FSLSX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 21.04%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 29.88%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BERCX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BERCX Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund	10.02%	11.77%	11.35%	6.93%	-11.61%	27.30%	-3.83%	23.31%	-10.92%	16.98%
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	21.04%	0.24%	9.25%	20.54%	-7.37%	33.32%	8.24%	34.54%	-16.90%	17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BERCX and FSLSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2002	0.89

The correlation between BERCX and FSLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BERCX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BERCX

BERCX Risk / Return Rank: 29
BERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
BERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FSLSX

FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BERCX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BERCX	FSLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.73	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.30	-0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.32	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	3.32	-1.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.15	10.82	-3.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BERCX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BERCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BERCX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BERCX	FSLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	1.73	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.45	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.52	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.54	-0.14

Drawdowns

BERCX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BERCX drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, smaller than the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERCX and FSLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BERCX	FSLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.71%	-69.87%	+17.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.45%	-9.79%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.57%	-26.81%	+7.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.04%	-26.81%	+4.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.41%	-47.98%	+5.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	0.00%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-8.28%	+0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	2.99%	+0.39%

Volatility

BERCX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) have volatilities of 4.44% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BERCX	FSLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	4.27%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.95%	14.50%	-2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.21%	18.78%	-2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	20.50%	-3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.24%	21.92%	-2.68%

BERCX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BERCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

BERCX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

BERCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.56%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BERCX Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund	11.56%	12.71%	13.39%	3.20%	1.12%	0.60%	1.12%	2.08%	8.03%	23.00%	3.32%	0.92%
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.41%	2.49%	2.13%	7.29%	0.84%	4.84%	14.59%	6.57%	19.71%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BERCX and FSLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, BERCX and FSLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BERCX or FSLSX?

BERCX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to FSLSX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERCX dropped -52.71% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.