BERCX vs. FCMVX
BERCX (Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund) and FCMVX (Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BERCX returned 7.88%/yr vs 25.98%/yr for FCMVX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BERCX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FCMVX.
Performance
BERCX vs. FCMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BERCX achieves a 12.84% return, which is significantly lower than FCMVX's 26.40% return.
BERCX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.35%
FCMVX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 26.40%
- 1Y
- 41.78%
- 3Y*
- 41.51%
- 5Y*
- 25.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BERCX vs. FCMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERCX Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund | 12.84% | 11.77% | 11.35% | 6.93% | -11.61% | 27.30% | -3.83% | 23.31% | -10.92% | 14.42% |
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund | 26.40% | 12.62% | 87.16% | 23.07% | -10.26% | 34.12% | 0.52% | 23.65% | -18.69% | 12.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BERCX and FCMVX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between BERCX and FCMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BERCX vs. FCMVX — Risk / Return Rank
BERCX
FCMVX
BERCX vs. FCMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BERCX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.42 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.92 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.26 | 15.56 | -9.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BERCX vs. FCMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BERCX drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, which is greater than FCMVX's maximum drawdown of -44.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERCX and FCMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BERCX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.71% | -44.63% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -10.21% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.57% | -38.56% | +18.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.04% | -38.56% | +16.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -1.18% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -9.19% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.58% | +0.78% |
Volatility
BERCX vs. FCMVX - Volatility Comparison
Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) at 3.31%. This indicates that BERCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BERCX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.31% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 12.24% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.55% | 16.48% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 60.56% | -43.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 47.40% | -28.26% |
BERCX vs. FCMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BERCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMVX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BERCX vs. FCMVX - Dividend Comparison
BERCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, more than FCMVX's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERCX Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund | 11.27% | 12.71% | 13.39% | 3.20% | 1.12% | 0.60% | 1.12% | 2.08% | 8.03% | 23.00% | 3.32% | 0.92% |
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund | 3.91% | 6.68% | 76.67% | 1.29% | 1.68% | 1.39% | 2.19% | 1.68% | 2.99% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BERCX and FCMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BERCX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to FCMVX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERCX dropped -52.71% vs FCMVX's -44.63%.
FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BERCX and FCMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer