PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BERCX vs. FCMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BERCX vs. FCMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BERCX achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than FCMVX's 24.73% return.


BERCX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.86%
6M
5.38%
YTD
10.50%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
8.50%

FCMVX

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.35%
6M
18.31%
YTD
24.73%
1Y
35.97%
3Y*
42.47%
5Y*
26.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BERCX vs. FCMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BERCX
Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund
10.50%11.77%11.35%6.93%-11.61%27.30%-3.83%23.31%-10.92%14.42%
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
24.73%12.62%87.16%23.07%-10.26%34.12%0.52%23.65%-18.69%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BERCX and FCMVX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.93

The correlation between BERCX and FCMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BERCX vs. FCMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BERCX
BERCX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FCMVX
FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BERCX vs. FCMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BERCXFCMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.38

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

3.52

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

13.57

-8.60

BERCX vs. FCMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BERCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the FCMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BERCX and FCMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BERCX vs. FCMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BERCX drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, which is greater than FCMVX's maximum drawdown of -44.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERCX and FCMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BERCXFCMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.71%

-44.63%

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-10.21%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.57%

-38.56%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.04%

-38.56%

+16.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-0.44%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-9.25%

+1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.65%

+0.75%

Volatility

BERCX vs. FCMVX - Volatility Comparison

Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund (BERCX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) have volatilities of 4.66% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BERCXFCMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

4.83%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

12.40%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

16.67%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

60.60%

-43.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

47.54%

-28.40%

BERCX vs. FCMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BERCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMVX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BERCX vs. FCMVX - Dividend Comparison

BERCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.51%, more than FCMVX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BERCX
Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund
11.51%12.71%13.39%3.20%1.12%0.60%1.12%2.08%8.03%23.00%3.32%0.92%
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
3.96%6.68%76.67%1.29%1.68%1.39%2.19%1.68%2.99%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BERCX and FCMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCMVX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to BERCX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERCX dropped -52.71% vs FCMVX's -44.63%.

FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BERCX and FCMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer