PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEPR.TO vs. XPF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEPR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BEPR.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEPR.TO achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than XPF.TO's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BEPR.TO has outperformed XPF.TO with an annualized return of 4.71%, while XPF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.86% annualized return.


BEPR.TO

1D
0.24%
1M
0.47%
6M
0.03%
YTD
-0.09%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
4.71%

XPF.TO

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.90%
6M
0.16%
YTD
1.55%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
3.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEPR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BEPR.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF
-0.09%6.68%14.36%6.62%-19.22%8.37%0.94%32.29%-12.67%14.60%
XPF.TO
iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.55%9.33%14.80%7.19%-19.48%11.51%5.34%8.88%-7.32%10.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BEPR.TO and XPF.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

0.18

The correlation between BEPR.TO and XPF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEPR.TO vs. XPF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEPR.TO
BEPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BEPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XPF.TO
XPF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XPF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEPR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BEPR.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEPR.TOXPF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.17

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.39

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

4.63

-2.26

BEPR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the XPF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEPR.TO and XPF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEPR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -69.85%, which is greater than XPF.TO's maximum drawdown of -43.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEPR.TO and XPF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEPR.TOXPF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.85%

-43.52%

-26.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-3.84%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.15%

-7.54%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.03%

-24.67%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.41%

-43.52%

-7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.46%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.44%

-4.73%

-7.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.15%

+0.34%

Volatility

BEPR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BEPR.TO) is 1.94%, while iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO) has a volatility of 2.11%. This indicates that BEPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEPR.TOXPF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

2.11%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

4.68%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.16%

5.55%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.70%

8.57%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

14.39%

+1.71%

Dividends

BEPR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Dividend Comparison

BEPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, more than XPF.TO's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEPR.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF
8.98%9.28%9.19%9.58%9.26%6.87%6.37%6.70%9.17%7.43%8.31%9.40%
XPF.TO
iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
5.23%5.08%5.21%5.74%5.46%4.30%4.95%5.12%4.94%4.59%5.14%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


BEPR.TO and XPF.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Brompton and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEPR.TO and XPF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer