PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSV.L vs. LWDB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Special Values (FSV.L) and Law Debenture Corp (LWDB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSV.L
Fidelity Special Values
-3.95%37.21%15.72%3.44%-4.97%26.66%-9.74%25.12%-9.15%13.94%
LWDB.L
Law Debenture Corp
1.13%22.22%15.92%8.07%0.40%20.31%13.89%24.59%-11.55%22.22%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

FSV.L:

£409.98M

LWDB.L:

£550.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FSV.L:

£254.11M

LWDB.L:

£531.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

FSV.L:

£165.36M

LWDB.L:

£438.64M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSV.L achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly lower than LWDB.L's 1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FSV.L has underperformed LWDB.L with an annualized return of 10.84%, while LWDB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.


FSV.L

1D
1.52%
1M
-12.72%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
3.40%
1Y
27.91%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
10.84%

LWDB.L

1D
1.93%
1M
-11.17%
YTD
1.13%
6M
1.40%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSV.L
FSV.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FSV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FSV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LWDB.L
LWDB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LWDB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LWDB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
LWDB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LWDB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LWDB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Special Values (FSV.L) and Law Debenture Corp (LWDB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSV.LLWDB.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

1.44

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.37

1.96

+0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.78

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.20

6.90

+1.30

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the LWDB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSV.L and LWDB.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSV.LLWDB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.44

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.70

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.60

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.29

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between FSV.L and LWDB.L is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L - Dividend Comparison

FSV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than LWDB.L's 3.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSV.L
Fidelity Special Values
2.54%2.44%3.05%3.15%2.78%2.21%2.38%2.61%2.19%1.80%1.62%1.67%
LWDB.L
Law Debenture Corp
3.36%3.29%3.71%3.95%3.91%3.58%5.64%3.00%3.30%2.70%3.06%3.25%

Drawdowns

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSV.L drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, smaller than the maximum LWDB.L drawdown of -74.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSV.L and LWDB.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSV.LLWDB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.87%

-74.53%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.02%

-12.85%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.22%

-19.54%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.87%

-40.78%

-11.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.72%

-11.17%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-10.61%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.31%

0.00%

Volatility

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Special Values (FSV.L) and Law Debenture Corp (LWDB.L) have volatilities of 7.80% and 7.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSV.LLWDB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

7.67%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

11.51%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

16.81%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

17.21%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

21.63%

+0.33%

Financials

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fidelity Special Values and Law Debenture Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
146.83M
185.77M
(FSV.L) Total Revenue
(LWDB.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

FSV.L vs. LWDB.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fidelity Special Values and Law Debenture Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
97.2%
Portfolio components
FSV.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fidelity Special Values reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 146.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LWDB.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Law Debenture Corp reported a gross profit of 180.57M and revenue of 185.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.2%.

FSV.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fidelity Special Values reported an operating income of 142.74M and revenue of 146.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 97.2%.

LWDB.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Law Debenture Corp reported an operating income of 154.75M and revenue of 185.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 83.3%.

FSV.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fidelity Special Values reported a net income of 138.91M and revenue of 146.83M, resulting in a net margin of 94.6%.

LWDB.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Law Debenture Corp reported a net income of 149.66M and revenue of 185.77M, resulting in a net margin of 80.6%.