PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BENJ vs. MARB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BENJ vs. MARB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BENJ achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than MARB's 1.26% return.


BENJ

1D
0.01%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MARB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.42%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BENJ vs. MARB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
1.47%3.75%
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
1.26%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BENJ and MARB is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

-0.09

The correlation between BENJ and MARB shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BENJ vs. MARB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BENJ
BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MARB
MARB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BENJ vs. MARB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BENJMARBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.02

1.32

+3.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.79

2.56

+7.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.19

20.98

+25.21

BENJ vs. MARB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BENJ Sharpe Ratio is 5.70, which is higher than the MARB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BENJ and MARB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BENJMARBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70

1.17

+4.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.43

0.36

+6.07

Drawdowns

BENJ vs. MARB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BENJ drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, smaller than the maximum MARB drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BENJ and MARB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BENJMARBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-11.99%

+11.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.39%

-2.43%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-1.40%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.30%

-0.22%

Volatility

BENJ vs. MARB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) is 0.06%, while First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) has a volatility of 0.47%. This indicates that BENJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BENJMARBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

0.47%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.23%

2.18%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67%

5.31%

-4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.60%

4.27%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.60%

5.60%

-5.00%

BENJ vs. MARB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BENJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MARB's 2.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BENJ vs. MARB - Dividend Comparison

BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
2.98%3.01%2.11%2.20%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


BENJ and MARB have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MARB has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to BENJ (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BENJ dropped -0.39% vs MARB's -11.99%.

On 1-year performance, MARB leads with 6.18% vs 3.81% for BENJ. On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MARB has performed better with a 6.18% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.30% for MARB.

MARB has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

BENJ is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while MARB is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BENJ and 2.30% for MARB.

BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.70 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BENJ and MARB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer