BEGIX vs. HFQAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BEGIX (Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund) and HFQAX (Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund) are both Dividend funds. Over the past 10 years, BEGIX returned 11.26%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for HFQAX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BEGIX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for HFQAX.

Performance

BEGIX vs. HFQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund (BEGIX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEGIX achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than HFQAX's 17.80% return. Over the past 10 years, BEGIX has outperformed HFQAX with an annualized return of 11.26%, while HFQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.90% annualized return.

BEGIX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: 5.19%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 1Y: 10.98%
• 3Y*: 7.19%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 11.26%
• ALL TIME*: 10.21%

HFQAX

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 3.62%
• 6M: 10.24%
• YTD: 17.80%
• 1Y: 30.15%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: 8.90%
• ALL TIME*: 5.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BEGIX Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HFQAX Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BEGIX vs. HFQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BEGIX Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund	8.95%	1.91%	4.81%	12.52%	-3.16%	28.06%	8.64%	30.56%	-0.62%	20.94%
HFQAX Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund	17.80%	29.61%	6.86%	10.17%	-6.59%	12.45%	1.66%	20.87%	-15.86%	19.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BEGIX and HFQAX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2006	0.76

The correlation between BEGIX and HFQAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BEGIX vs. HFQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEGIX

BEGIX Risk / Return Rank: 25
BEGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BEGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BEGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BEGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BEGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

HFQAX

HFQAX Risk / Return Rank: 86
HFQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HFQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HFQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
HFQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
HFQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEGIX vs. HFQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund (BEGIX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEGIX	HFQAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	2.32	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	3.14	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.44	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	2.81	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.30	10.08	-6.78

BEGIX vs. HFQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the HFQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEGIX and HFQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BEGIX vs. HFQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEGIX drawdown since its inception was -43.85%, smaller than the maximum HFQAX drawdown of -52.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGIX and HFQAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEGIX	HFQAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.85%	-52.77%	+8.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	-9.99%	+2.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.48%	-12.20%	-17.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.48%	-21.83%	-7.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.01%	-34.79%	-2.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.70%	0.00%	-14.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-10.79%	+4.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	2.78%	+0.01%

Volatility

BEGIX vs. HFQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund (BEGIX) is 3.34%, while Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that BEGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEGIX	HFQAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	3.78%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.85%	10.34%	-2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.79%	12.09%	-1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.73%	13.07%	+6.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.45%	14.44%	+5.01%

BEGIX vs. HFQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEGIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than HFQAX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEGIX vs. HFQAX - Dividend Comparison

BEGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.21%, more than HFQAX's 5.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BEGIX Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund	25.21%	27.63%	26.84%	9.81%	8.44%	3.01%	1.73%	9.81%	10.16%	11.59%	2.06%	8.83%
HFQAX Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund	5.79%	6.59%	7.96%	7.89%	8.02%	6.92%	7.25%	6.80%	7.66%	6.03%	6.77%	6.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEGIX and HFQAX in my portfolio?

BEGIX and HFQAX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEGIX or HFQAX?

HFQAX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to BEGIX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGIX dropped -43.85% vs HFQAX's -52.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.