BEG vs. UUUG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and UUUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. BEG is actively managed, while UUUG is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

BEG vs. UUUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF (UUUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BEG

• 1D: -9.38%
• 1M: -7.23%
• YTD: 552.25%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UUUG

• 1D: -15.32%
• 1M: -35.38%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEG vs. UUUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	162.42%
UUUG Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF	-42.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BEG and UUUG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026	0.56

Return for Risk

BEG vs. UUUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF (UUUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEG	UUUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	24.77	-0.40	+25.17

Drawdowns

BEG vs. UUUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEG drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, smaller than the maximum UUUG drawdown of -75.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEG and UUUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEG	UUUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.85%	-75.51%	+15.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.90%	-70.56%	+56.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.14%	-51.33%	+35.19%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BEG	UUUG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	213.85%	191.02%	+22.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	213.85%	191.02%	+22.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	213.85%	191.02%	+22.83%

BEG vs. UUUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BEG and UUUG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

BEG vs. UUUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BEG nor UUUG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEG and UUUG in my portfolio?

BEG and UUUG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BEG or UUUG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEG or UUUG?

BEG and UUUG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEG or UUUG?

BEG and UUUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.