BEG vs. NEMG
BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
BEG vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEG achieves a 658.88% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's -20.44% return.
BEG
- 1D
- -13.66%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 658.88%
- 6M
- 577.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEMG
- 1D
- -7.98%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -20.44%
- 6M
- -28.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEG vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 658.88% | 1.77% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | -20.44% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEG and NEMG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEG vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEG vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEG drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, roughly equal to the maximum NEMG drawdown of -57.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEG and NEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEG | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.85% | -57.56% | -2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.66% | -53.44% | +39.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.74% | -23.21% | +6.47% |
Volatility
BEG vs. NEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEG | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 212.91% | 102.63% | +110.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 212.91% | 102.63% | +110.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 212.91% | 102.63% | +110.28% |
BEG vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BEG and NEMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
BEG vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BEG nor NEMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BEG and NEMG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG and NEMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
BEG and NEMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for BEG and NEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer