BEG vs. MULL
BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
BEG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEG achieves a 562.24% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 774.91% return.
BEG
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -9.86%
- YTD
- 562.24%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- -15.62%
- 1M
- 119.20%
- YTD
- 774.91%
- 6M
- 1,229.17%
- 1Y
- 5,016.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 562.24% | -5.55% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 774.91% | 46.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEG and MULL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
BEG
MULL
BEG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 38.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 24.84 | 6.53 | +18.32 |
Drawdowns
BEG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEG drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEG and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.85% | -72.29% | +12.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -15.62% | +3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -20.61% | +4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.82% | — |
Volatility
BEG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 57.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 107.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 212.92% | 133.41% | +79.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 212.92% | 136.72% | +76.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 212.92% | 136.72% | +76.20% |
BEG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
BEG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEG and MULL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for BEG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BEG and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for BEG and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer