BEG vs. FGRU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and FGRU (T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BEG is actively managed, while FGRU is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for FGRU.

Performance

BEG vs. FGRU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG) and T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF (FGRU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BEG

• 1D: -13.66%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: 658.88%
• 6M: 577.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FGRU

• 1D: -7.64%
• 1M: -35.58%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEG vs. FGRU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	213.16%
FGRU T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF	-64.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BEG and FGRU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026	0.32

Return for Risk

BEG vs. FGRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG) and T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF (FGRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

BEG vs. FGRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEG drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, smaller than the maximum FGRU drawdown of -65.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEG and FGRU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEG	FGRU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.85%	-65.96%	+6.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.66%	-64.60%	+50.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.74%	-40.75%	+24.01%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BEG	FGRU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	212.91%	199.26%	+13.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	212.91%	199.26%	+13.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	212.91%	199.26%	+13.65%

BEG vs. FGRU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEG vs. FGRU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BEG nor FGRU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEG and FGRU in my portfolio?

BEG and FGRU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BEG or FGRU?

On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEG or FGRU?

BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for FGRU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEG or FGRU?

BEG and FGRU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BEG and FGRU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BEG and 1.50% for FGRU.